Scott Bessant at Treasury, threats of day-one tariffs on trading partners, and calls for another end-of-year rally buoyed markets. It is a seasonally bullish time for the equity markets with Christmas around the corner.

 

By now, you have probably heard that hedge fund manager Bessant will take the reins at the U.S. Treasury in January. Markets cheered that news. Most market participants believe Bessant is the man best suited for that post. Investors hope he will be market-friendly and a voice of moderation in the new Trump administration.

 

But before Bessant or anyone else gets carried away with the idea that Trump has lost that loving feeling he has for tariff diplomacy, think again. The president-to-be fired a broadside at China, Mexico, and Canada on Monday threatening 25 percent on all products from Mexico and Canada as one of his first executive orders. That is a big deal since exports to the U.S. account for 27 percent of Mexico's economy and 21 percent of Canada's.

 

And just for good measure, he will slap an additional 10 percent tariff on Chinese goods above any additional tariffs he puts in place. I found it interesting that he seemed to go easy on America's number one bashing boy, Xi Jinping, in his broadside. There are rumors that negotiations over tariffs and other issues are already underway with China. If so, I suspect it would be at the urging of  Trump's unofficial everything buddy, Elon Musk. 

 

Musk's EV company, Tesla, has its largest and most productive factory in China and would lose big time if relations go any further south between the two countries.

 

As for Mexico and Canada, Trump's threats were not just about economics. He is promising new tariffs on both nations unless they curb the flow of illegal drugs into the U.S., especially fentanyl. China is the main producer of fentanyl, while America's closest trading partners, Canada and Mexico, have become major conduits for the distribution of this drug into the U.S. He also insists that illegal immigrants are turned back before crossing our borders.

 

Two days later, after a conversation with the new Mexican President, Claudio Sheinbaum Pardo, which Trump described as a "very productive conversation," the problem was solved. "She has agreed to stop Migration through Mexico, and in the United States, effectively closing our Southern border," wrote Trump in a social media post. They also discussed illegal drugs as well. We await the response from Canada.

 

If these announcements evoke a certain amount of deja vu among readers, get used to it. In the Trump 1.0 version, the markets were treated to a daily diet of new tariffs, restrictions, exemptions, threats, bluster, temper tantrums, etc. Trump 2.0 should be even more entertaining. Trump will be Trump, that's for sure.

 

This latest tariff announcement had Wall Street, the media, as well as economists throughout the globe, immediately singing from their same old song sheet: higher inflation and slower growth. The first reaction to the news was a drop of more than 2.3 percent by the Mexican peso against the dollar. The Canadian dollar dropped by 1.4 percent. Since Trump's election, the peso year-to-date has fallen more than 4 percent and the Canadian dollar almost 3 percent. How does that goose inflation? It doesn't.

 

Think about it. If a country's currency adjusts downward to offset a tariff increase (as most of the world's currencies are attempting to do this year against the dollar), there are no meaningful inflation consequences at the macroeconomic level. If the price of a Mexican imported T-shirt at Walmart drops 10 percent because the peso is cheaper against the dollar, a 10 percent tariff on that T-shirt ends up at the same price to holders of dollars.

 

Of course, I am describing a perfect economic world. Real-life tariffs, currency devaluations, and their impact on imported goods and products could spell inflation in some areas and deflation in others.

 

Tariff threats are one of the main reasons why the U.S. dollar keeps rising. It is part and parcel of what happens on the economic front in an era of populism. Tariffs make other countries poorer and ours richer. It is how to make America great again, or at least wealthier, through a beggar-thy-neighbor mercantilist approach. 

 

The problem, however, is that over the last eight years, many of our trading partners have also been swept up in populist movements. Foreign voters have created their versions of MAGA and will not take our new government's threats lying down. Tariffs levied by us will immediately be met by tariffs by them.

 

There is no right and wrong in Trump's approach, especially when you consider the number of deaths (75,000 deaths per year) due to fentanyl in the nation. Our drug policies to date have failed to stem the rise of this drug addiction or convince foreign exporters to find another market for their product.

 

The same could be said for stemming the flow of illegal immigrants. Democrats, Republicans, and independents alike have decided that illegal immigration is one of their top grievances. As such, this populist generation says that doing something is a far sight better than wringing hands while hoping that the bankrupt policies of the past will somehow begin to magically work. For better or worse, we as a nation are past that.

 

Hitting countries where it hurts (in their pocketbooks) is not a new approach. It is quite old. History will tell you it was the economic name of the game in Western Europe from the 16th to the 18th centuries. It is called mercantilism. Mercantilist policies included tariffs, subsidies, import quotas, and restrictions on foreign labor. They were designed to accumulate wealth, protect domestic industries, maintain employment, and bolster state power. At the time, it increased conflict among nations. Sound familiar?

 

As for the markets, most participants were unfazed by the tariff threats. During Trump's first term, those statements would send markets into a swoon. But stocks stayed firm and traders focused on other things. After the first four years, we have been there and done that.

 

We enter December at record highs. We could see a minor decline over the next week or two. It would be just profit-taking and a chance to buy the dip.  At that point I expect the year-end rally to take over into January.